What The New “Low-Carb” Study REALLY Says – Part 2

November 18, 2008 at 12:10 am 1 comment

Continued from –> Part 1

I found it amusing that the media turned this into a three ring circus, putting a misleading “low carb versus high carb,” “Atkins vindicated” or “Diet wars” spin on the story. But that’s mainstream journalism for you, right? Gotta sell those papers!

Just look at some of these headlines:

  • “Study Tips Scales in Atkins Diets Favor: Low Carb Regimen Better Than Low Fat Diet For Weight And Cholesterol, Major Study Shows. “
  • “Low-Carb and Low-Fat Diets Face Off “
  • “The Never-Ending Diet Wars”
  • “Low Carb Beats Low Fat in Diet Duel.”
  • “Atkins Diet is Safe and Far More Effective Than a Low-Fat One, Study Says”
  • “Unrestricted Low-Carb Diet Wins Hands Down”

Some of these headlines are hilarious! I wonder if any of these reporters actually read the whole study. Geez. Is it too much trouble to read 13 pages before you write a story that will be read by millions of already confused people suffering the pain and frustration of obesity?

Here’s a quick look at the study design.

The low fat restricted calorie diet was based on American Heart Association guidelines. Calorie intake was set at 1500 for women, 1800 a day for men with 30% of calories from fat, and only 10% from saturated fat. Participants were instructed to eat low fat grains, vegetables, fruits and legumes and to limit their consumption of additional fats, sweets and high fat snacks.

The Mediterranean diet group was placed on a moderate fat, restricted calorie program rich in vegetables and low in red meat, with poultry and fish replacing beef and lamb. Energy intake was restricted to 1500 calories per day for women and 1800 calories per day for men with a goal of no more than 35% of calorie from fat. Added fat came mostly from nuts and olive oil.

The low carb diet was a non-restricted calorie plan aimed at providing 20 grams of carbs per day for the 2 month induction phase with a gradual increase to 120 grams per day to maintain the weight loss. Intakes of total calories, protein and fat were not limited. However, the participants were counselled to choose vegetarian sources of protein (more on that bizarre-twist shortly).

To be continued…

About the Author:

Tom Venuto is a natural bodybuilder, certified personal trainer and freelance fitness writer. Tom is the author of “Burn the Fat, Feed The Muscle,” which teaches you how to get lean without drugs or supplements using secrets of the world’s best bodybuilders and fitness models. Learn how to get rid of stubborn fat and increase your metabolism by visiting: www.burnthefat.com

Advertisement

Entry filed under: Burn the Fat. Tags: , , , .

What The New “Low-Carb” Study REALLY Says – Part 1 What The New “Low-Carb” Study REALLY Says – Part 3

1 Comment

Trackback this post


Recommended Resources

burn the fat, feed the muscle

Recent Posts


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.